The direct answer: FDD Item 3 requires franchisors to disclose litigation and regulatory history — and its reach is broader than most founders expect. Disclosure obligations extend beyond the franchise company itself to its parent companies, its predecessors, its affiliates (including affiliated franchise brands), and, individually, to every person disclosed in Item 2 — the management team and any individual with management-level responsibility for franchise sales, franchisee support, or other franchise operations, regardless of title. Covered matters span four categories: pending actions, material actions involving the franchise relationship (including lawsuits the franchisor files against its own franchisees), prior actions within a 10-year lookback, and currently effective government injunctive or restrictive orders — including state consent orders and assurances of discontinuance. State franchise laws frequently sweep broader than the federal baseline, which is why Item 3 should always be analyzed with your franchise attorney at the broadest standard that applies to your system.
Of the FDD's 23 disclosure items, Item 3 is one of the shortest for most franchisors — and one of the most consequential to get right. Prospective franchisees, franchise brokers, and state examiners all read it, and disclosure failures here aren't cosmetic: they go to the integrity of the entire disclosure document. This guide covers who Item 3 reaches, the four categories of disclosable matters, the lookback periods, how state law expands the requirements, and what Item 3 means for how you build and run your franchise company.
Who Item 3 Covers
Item 3 disclosure obligations extend beyond the franchise company itself. The parties covered:
| FDD Item 3 Litigation Disclosures: The Coverage — The Internicola Law Firm | |
|---|---|
| Who is Covered | Notes on the Reach |
| The franchisor (the franchise company) | All four categories of disclosable matters apply. |
| Predecessor companies | Predecessors over the prior 10 years — for example, a former owner of the franchise system. If a predecessor is no longer affiliated, the franchisor must make good-faith efforts to obtain updated litigation information. |
| Parent companies | Under the federal rule, parent litigation is disclosable when the parent backs the franchisor financially or guarantees its performance — but state laws and registration-state requirements frequently reach parent litigation more broadly, and the conservative practice is to analyze parent history in every case. |
| Affiliate companies — including affiliated franchise brands | Affiliate litigation is disclosable when the affiliate offers franchises under the franchisor's principal trademark or backs the franchisor — and government orders against any affiliate that has offered or sold franchises in any line of business within the last 10 years are disclosable. For multi-brand ownership groups, Item 3 must be analyzed across the entire corporate family. |
| Every individual disclosed in Item 2 | The management team and any individual with management-level responsibility for franchise sales, franchisee support, or other franchise activities — irrespective of title. If a person belongs in Item 2, their personal litigation history belongs in the Item 3 analysis. |
Two points deserve emphasis. First, the affiliate reach: if your ownership group operates multiple franchise brands, litigation involving an affiliated brand can be disclosable in this brand's FDD — multi-brand founders and platform operators need Item 3 analyzed across the whole corporate family, not one entity at a time. Second, the individual reach: Item 3 tracks Item 2, and Item 2 isn't limited to officers with formal titles — it captures anyone with management-level responsibility for franchise sales or franchisee support. Where the federal rule and a state's requirements differ, our approach is to analyze at the broader standard: over-analysis costs a conversation with your attorney; under-disclosure can cost your registrations.
The Four Categories of Disclosable Matters
1. Pending actions
Any pending administrative, criminal, or material civil action alleging a violation of a franchise, antitrust, or securities law, or alleging fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or comparable claims — including actions brought by the FTC, the Department of Justice, or a state Attorney General. A civil action is "material" when it's likely to influence a prospective franchisee's investment decision. Beyond those categories, other pending civil suits must be disclosed when they are material in the context of the size, nature, and financial condition of the franchise system — with some states requiring disclosure of a significant number of civil actions even irrespective of individual materiality. Arbitrations count; material foreign litigation counts; mediations generally do not unless they settle a disclosable suit.
2. Actions involving the franchise relationship — including suits the franchisor files
This is the category franchisors most often underestimate: material civil actions involving the franchise relationship filed during the last fiscal year must be disclosed — including lawsuits the franchisor initiates against its own franchisees. Franchise-relationship suits are presumed material even in small numbers, because they shed light on the health of the relationship and the franchisor's readiness to litigate against franchisees. "Franchise relationship" means contractual obligations between franchisor and franchisee arising from operation of the franchised business — suits against third parties like suppliers are outside this category. For franchisors, the practical takeaway is significant: every collection suit, termination action, or enforcement proceeding you file against a franchisee is a prospective annual disclosure that candidates and brokers will read. Litigation strategy and disclosure strategy are connected — another reason franchise counsel should be involved before disputes reach the courthouse.
3. Prior actions — the 10-year lookback
Felony convictions and nolo contendere pleas within 10 years before the FDD's issuance date must be disclosed, along with civil actions in the covered categories where the party was held liable — meaning the party had to pay money or other consideration, reduce an indebtedness, forgo enforcing its rights, or take action adverse to its interests. Dismissals generally need not be disclosed. Settlements require care: when a settled action is disclosable, its material terms generally must be disclosed even if the settlement is confidential (with limited exceptions for certain pre-franchising confidential settlements). Some states extend the lookback further — including, in certain registration states, to specified misdemeanor matters within the 10-year period.
4. Currently effective government orders
Injunctive or restrictive orders and decrees resulting from actions brought by public agencies — the FTC, SEC, state regulators, or a state Attorney General — under franchise, securities, antitrust, trade regulation, or trade practice laws. This is the category founders most frequently overlook, and it includes state consent orders and assurances of discontinuance, including those arising from franchise registration matters. An order is "currently effective" until vacated, rescinded, or expired by its terms — and many government orders contain no expiration term at all, meaning they can remain disclosable indefinitely.
State Requirements: Sometimes Broader Than the Federal Rule
The federal Franchise Rule is the floor, not the ceiling. The franchise registration states impose their own Item 3 requirements through state-specific FDD addenda, and they frequently sweep broader — reaching, in various states, a significant number of civil actions irrespective of individual materiality, specified misdemeanor matters within the 10-year period, actions brought by present or former purchasers or investors, actions affecting other professional licenses, and orders of national securities associations and exchanges. A multi-state FDD must satisfy every state it will be registered or used in — which means Item 3 should be prepared, from the start, at the broadest standard applicable to your system rather than patched state by state. This is one of many reasons your FDD should be built on a multi-state basis from day one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Item 3 is the litigation disclosure section of the Franchise Disclosure Document. It requires franchisors to disclose specified litigation and regulatory history — pending actions, material actions involving the franchise relationship, prior actions within a 10-year lookback, and currently effective government orders — for the franchise company, its parents, predecessors, and affiliates, and for each individual disclosed in Item 2.
No. Item 3's reach extends to the franchisor's predecessors, parent companies, affiliates — including affiliated franchise brands — and, individually, to every person disclosed in Item 2: the management team and any individual with management-level responsibility for franchise sales or franchisee support, regardless of title. The precise scope for parents and affiliates varies between the federal rule and state requirements, so the analysis should be made with your franchise attorney at the broadest applicable standard.
Yes. Material civil actions involving the franchise relationship filed during the last fiscal year must be disclosed — including franchisor-initiated suits against franchisees, which are presumed material even in small numbers. Collection actions, termination enforcement, and similar franchise-relationship suits become annual disclosures that prospective franchisees and brokers will read.
Yes. Item 3 covers currently effective government injunctive and restrictive orders in addition to court litigation — including state consent orders, assurances of discontinuance, and orders arising from franchising and franchise registration matters. Many government orders have no expiration term and can remain disclosable indefinitely.
No. Ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business is generally outside Item 3's scope, and dismissals generally need not be disclosed. But the lines — materiality, routine versus disclosable, the franchise-relationship boundary — are legal judgments that depend on the claims, the parties, and the states involved, and several states require more than the federal rule. Any litigation history should be reviewed with your franchise attorney rather than self-assessed.
Questions About Your FDD?
Every FDD item involves disclosures specific to your business and the states where you'll offer franchises. We've built FDDs for 350+ franchise brands through attorney-led franchise development. Call (800) 976-4904 or complete the form below.