Business & Franchise Lawyers
Since 1996

Call Today for Help
(800) 976-4904
Contact Form

Determining a Workable Model for Franchising a Medical Practice

Charles Internicola

by Charles Internicola
National Business and Franchise Lawyer

Date: 02/04/2014 | Category: Start a Franchise | No comments

Is It Possible to Franchise a Medical Practice Successfully?

Yes…but you must proceed with caution and a precise plan.

When it comes to health law and physician based franchises the primary "legal" barrier that a franchisor faces relates to state specific laws that prohibit the "corporate practice of medicine".  Although every state is different – with New York and California being the most stringent and severe – generally‚ the corporate practice of medicine doctrine refers to a series of state specific regulations that prohibit a corporate entity from maintaining control over a licensed physicians delivery of medical services.  That is‚ the corporate practice of medicine doctrine seeks to prevent non-physicians from profiting from or interfering with a physicians delivery of medical services.

So How Does Franchising Fit In – If Franchising Fits In at All?

Franchising fits in when it provides a licensed physician with a business platform – comprised of "advertising and business" systems that enhance a physician franchisees earning potential along with his or her ability to deliver valuable medical services.  Franchising does not fit in where the franchise model is established as an end-run around state licensing requirements with the goal of permitting non-physician investor franchisees (and franchisors) to profit from a physician employees and/or physician franchisees delivery of medical services.

So‚ as a franchise lawyer‚ my take on this issue is that "franchising and physician services" mix best when:

  1. The franchise model is focused on franchisees who are licensed physicians;
  2. The franchise model is focused on providing franchisee physicians with a marketing plan and system focused on distinguishing and branding that physicians services;
  3. The franchise model is focused on elective procedures and preventative care that does not‚ necessarily involve third-party payers; and
  4. The franchise model is focused on a fixed fee royalty structure that is not tied to the physicians revenues. 

At the International Franchise Expo this past weekend‚ I came across "Tru-Skin Dermatology". Although I did not have an opportunity to review Tru-Skin's FDD‚ from their marketing materials‚ it appeared that they were focused on "physician franchisees" and the development of marketing systems‚ service offerings and products designed to enhance a physicians marketing position within his or her local community.  That is‚ Tru-Skin appears to have created "marketing packages" for services that many physicians either fail to offer or fail to properly market.  So‚ from a franchise and marketing perspective‚ try-Skin caught my attention.  However‚ I would be curious to learn how Tru-Skin structures its royalties‚ whether or not non-physician franchisees are permitted to purchase a franchise and how they deal with potential issues involving the corporate practice of medicine?

Definitely interesting – especially since healthcare and franchising appear to be two trends bound to continue accelerating toward one another. If you are a franchisor or prospective franchisor of corporate wellness programs‚ appearance enhancement services‚ emergency care service or screening services‚ I would be really interested in hearing your take on these issues.

DISCLAIMER – I have not reviewed Tru-Skin's FDD and business model‚ as such‚ I have no idea as to whether or not Tru-Skin is a good investment.  Nor do I have any clue (without having reviewed the FDD) as to whether or not the Tru-Skin business model complies with corporate practice of medicine regulations.  As a consistent policy of Franchise Law Solutions‚ The Internicola Law Firm‚ P.C. and as a franchise lawyer‚ I do not recommend particular franchises nor franchise investments.

Related Articles:

Leave a Reply: